The process of fabricating an indirect restoration takes careful attention to detail at every step because there are many opportunities for error. The most critical step is the first impression as this is what every step that follows hinges on. Despite this, lab technicians can sometimes be asked to create flawless restorations based on flawed or incomplete impressions. Technicians cannot accurately add detail that the impression itself lacks. Only the dentist can provide the information necessary for an error-free reproduction. This is why the use of careful, proper technique is essential to avoiding troublesome voids and creating a quality impression.
Critical areas require exact duplication of detail, such as margins (especially subgingival) and the fine details of tooth preparations for crowns, veneers, onlays or inlays. It’s not easy to compensate for any voids or errors in the first impression and any flaws can even be compounded throughout the rest of the procedure.
Gingival displacement and accurate impressioning still pose some of the greatest challenges in dentistry, despite the use of modern impressioning materials. Though today’s materials may be more forgiving than their predecessors, they can’t fully compensate for shortcomings in the procedure.
A recent evaluation conducted within a commercial dental laboratory determined that 86% of crown-and-bridge impressions contained at least one detectable error and 55% contained a critical error related to the finish line. Soft and hard tissue anatomy, gingival displacement, moisture management and the behaviour of impressioning materials are all part of the equation.
Always choose appropriate tray and wash impression material viscosities and material class according to the impression technique and indication to be carried out. In the impression taking procedure, several different materials and techniques are available. Elastomers are the best materials to comply with the requirements needed for indirect restorations.
Polyether, for example, produces highly accurate results in a single step using one or two different viscosity materials (monophase or one-step) and is arguably the most forgiving when moisture control is difficult as it is inherently hydrophilic from the beginning. Implants, dentures, complex multi-unit cases and cases where moisture control is a challenge are all ideal applications for polyether.
According to its manufacturer, 3M Impregum Penta Polyether Impression Material is still the only true polyether impression manufactured in the world and is considered “the gold standard” for the most challenging of cases. More detail on the advantages of Impregum Penta can be found here. Another option is vinyl polysiloxane (VPS or A-Silicone), which is the most widely used material for one or two-step impression techniques.
3M Imprint 4 VPS impression material has been on the market for over a decade and has won several industry awards and accolades thanks to its intrinsic hydrophilicity. Imprint 4 reproduces fine details even in moist environments, so you can work quickly and confidently.
To learn more about 3M products click here or hit the link below to browse 3M other impression materials.